Last updated: 2025-03-11
Checks: 2 0
Knit directory: LSR_website_2023/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version a445ec4. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: commands.R
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/index.Rmd) and HTML (docs/index.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.
| File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rmd | a445ec4 | L-ENA | 2025-03-11 | Update of general content, Updated at 2025-03-11 17:17:04 |
| html | a445ec4 | L-ENA | 2025-03-11 | Update of general content, Updated at 2025-03-11 17:17:04 |
| html | 5b8cb25 | L-ENA | 2025-03-11 | Build site. |
| Rmd | c9c431e | L-ENA | 2025-03-11 | Update of the <LatestUpdates> page, Updated at 2025-03-11 15:09:05 |
| html | c9c431e | L-ENA | 2025-03-11 | Update of the <LatestUpdates> page, Updated at 2025-03-11 15:09:05 |
| html | 7434162 | L-ENA | 2023-03-21 | Build site. |
| html | 891d56e | Lena Schmidt | 2021-11-17 | Build site. |
| html | 202cf69 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-11-05 | Build site. |
| html | 5537429 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-11-03 | Build site. |
| html | 7ddf636 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-10-18 | Build site. |
| html | 605b46f | Lena Schmidt | 2021-09-14 | Build site. |
| html | 3be825f | Lena Schmidt | 2021-09-07 | Build site. |
| html | aed42ce | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-31 | Build site. |
| html | 0ff9f26 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-31 | Build site. |
| html | 7d8030b | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-04 | Build site. |
| html | 6124c77 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-04 | Build site. |
| html | 1399ad6 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-03 | Build site. |
| html | 2569cc1 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-03 | Build site. |
| html | e022fc2 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-08-03 | Build site. |
| html | 3674a0f | Lena Schmidt | 2021-07-07 | Build site. |
| html | 5bad23b | Lena Schmidt | 2021-07-07 | Build site. |
| html | 6b05077 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-20 | Build site. |
| html | 821a005 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-20 | Build site. |
| html | 1766206 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-20 | Build site. |
| html | c31a64c | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-19 | Build site. |
| html | db43913 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-19 | Build site. |
| Rmd | 0194d67 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-19 | Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58 |
| html | 0194d67 | Lena Schmidt | 2021-05-19 | Updated text after publication of base review, Updated at 2021-05-19 16:31:58 |
| html | 21b1c0f | L-ENA | 2020-11-13 | Build site. |
| html | 45aa0d5 | L-ENA | 2020-11-13 | Build site. |
| html | ed31ccb | L-ENA | 2020-11-06 | Build site. |
| html | a34fbc8 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | b5505f2 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| Rmd | e826d62 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Updated index |
| html | e826d62 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Updated index |
| html | 93bdfca | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 7bafffe | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 26e1d9b | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | c16ec66 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | c86cb34 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | e727571 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 798d57b | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 7074ef2 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| Rmd | aa66c47 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Customised about/publications etc |
| html | 02b0296 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 5061dd3 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| html | 581260b | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Build site. |
| Rmd | 7fbed26 | L-ENA | 2020-10-30 | Start workflowr project. |
This living review looks at data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation. On this website you will find information about the latest updates to the review, including interactive maps to filter and access review content, as well as additional information about related publications and authors of this review and its software.
The reliable and usable (semi)automation of data extraction can support the field of systematic review by reducing the workload required to gather information about the conduct and results of the included studies. This living systematic review examines published approaches for data extraction from reports of clinical studies.
We systematically and continually search PubMed, ACL Anthology, arXiv, OpenAlex via EPPI-Reviewer, and the dblp computer science bibliography. Full text screening and data extraction are conducted using a mix of open-source and commercial tools. This living review update includes publications up to August 2024 and OpenAlex content up September 2024.
117 publications are included in this review. Of these, 30 (26%) used full texts while the rest used titles and abstracts. A total of 112 (96%) publications developed classifiers for randomised controlled trials. Over 30 entities were extracted, with PICOs (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) being the most frequently extracted. Data are available from 53 (45%), and code from 49 (42%) publications. Nine (8%) implemented publicly available tools.
This living systematic review presents an overview of (semi)automated data-extraction literature of interest to different types of literature review. We identified a broad evidence base of publications describing data extraction for interventional reviews and a small number of publications extracting other study types. Between review updates, large language models emerged as a new tool for data extraction. While facilitating access to automated extraction, they showed a trend of decreasing quality of results reporting, especially quantitative results such as recall and lower reproducibility of results. Compared with the previous update, trends such as transition to relation extraction and sharing of code and datasets stayed similar.